Vanadium

View Categories

Vanadium

9 min read

Orbitals and Energies #

Note – these are listed in BINDING ENERGY

 

V 2p ≈ 525 eV

V 2s ≈ 630 eV

V 3s ≈ 66 eV

V 3p ≈ 38 eV

V2O5 by XPS - Survey spectrum with peak markers
V2O5 by XPS - Survey spectrum with peak markers

Doublet Separations #

V 2p (metal) = 7.6 eV

V 2p (oxide) = 7.4 eV

XPS of V 2p with doublet separation

Common Overlaps for Cu 2p #

I 3p – Pr 3d – Bi 4s – Sb 3s – Mn LMM (Al Ka X-rays)

Common Overlaps for Cu 3s #

Pr 4d – Nd 4d – Al 2s – Pm 4d – In 4s – Ge 3p – I 4p

Cu metal by XPS: Cu 2p region with overlapping peak markers
Cu metal by XPS: Cu 2p region with overlapping peak markers

Auger Energies #

Note – these are listed in KINETIC ENERGY

 

V LMM ≈ 465 eV

XPS of V LMM Region

Common Binding Energies – V 2p #

Species #

B.E. / eV #

Charge Ref #

Reference #

V Metal

512.7

Cu 2p (932.3 eV)

V2O3

515.15

O 1s (530 eV)

VO2

515.15

O 1s (530 eV)

V2O5

517

O 1s (530 eV)

V6O13

516.5

O 1s (530 eV)

V3O5

515.5

C 1s (285 eV)

V4O7

516

C 1s (285 eV)

Theory and Background #

Vanadium exhibits significant spin orbit coupling, and a Coster-Kronig differential broadening between the doublet peaks.

 

While V(V) species show a sharp single line-shape, V(IV) and V(III) exhibit some broadening, which is attributed to multiplet structure.
 
In practice, the multiplet structure for V(II), V(III) and V(IV) species may not be well-resolved in XPS spectra and can appear as a broadened peak.
V2O5 Vanadium Doublet CK Broadening

Experimental Advice #

Analysis of Vanadium by XPS is typically performed on the V 2p region, which overlaps very slightly with the O 1s region, slightly complicating analysis (Figure 1), though provided an extended region is acquired, collecting both V 2p peaks and the O 1s region then background application and peak fitting may be fairly trivial. The doublet separation varies with chemical state, and is around 7.5 eV.

V2O5 reduces upon exposure to X-ray irradiation.

V2O5 XPS V 2p and O 1s regions
V2O5 XPS V 2p and O 1s regions

Data Analysis Guidance #

As with most first row TMs, the 2p1/2 peak exhibits a larger FWHM than that of the 2p3/2 due to Coster-Kronig processes. So do NOT use the peak FWHM locking function in CasaXPS or similar, to set identical widths, when analysing V 2p doublets.

Calibration to O 1s is often advantageous due to proximity (530 eV).

V2O5 fitting

Reference Datasets #

 

Coming soon

References #

  1. Islam, M. J., et al. (2020). “The effect of metal precursor on copper phase dispersion and nanoparticle formation for the catalytic transformations of furfural.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental: 119062. Read it online here.
  2. Miller, A. and G. Simmons (1993). “Copper by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 2(1): 55-60. Read it online here.
  3. Vasquez, R. (1998). “Cu2O by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 5(4): 257-261. Read it online here.
  4. Vasquez, R. (1998). “CuO by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 5(4): 262-266. Read it online here.
  5. Biesinger, M. C. (2017). “Advanced analysis of copper X‐ray photoelectron spectra.” Surface and interface analysis 49(13): 1325-1334. Read it online here.
  6. Thøgersen, A., et al. (2008). “An experimental study of charge distribution in crystalline and amorphous Si nanoclusters in thin silica films.” Journal of Applied Physics 103(2): 024308. Read it online here.
  7. Moretti, G. (1998). “Auger parameter and Wagner plot in the characterization of chemical states by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a review.” Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 95(2-3): 95-144. Read it online here.
  8. Batista, J., et al. (2001). “On the structural characteristics of γ-alumina-supported Pd–Cu bimetallic catalysts.” Applied Catalysis A: General 217(1-2): 55-68. Read it online here.
  9. Ghijsen, Jacques, et al. “Electronic structure of Cu 2 O and CuO.” Physical Review B 38.16 (1988): 11322. Read it online here.