
Terbium #
Orbitals and Energies #
Note – these are listed in BINDING ENERGY
Tb 3d ≈ 1240 eV
Tb 4s ≈ 400 eV
Tb 4p ≈ 280 eV
Tb 4d ≈ 150 eV
Tb 5s ≈ 440 eV
Tb 5p ≈ 26 eV
Tb 4f ≈ 3 eV
Doublet Separations #
Tb 3d = 32 eV
Common Overlaps for Tb 3d #
I 3p – Pr 3p – Au NOO (Al Ka X-rays) – K LMM (Al Ka X-rays) – C KLL (Al Ka X-rays)
Theory and Background #
Tb³⁺: 4f⁸ ground-state configuration, typical for Tb₂O₃.
Tb⁴⁺: 4f⁷ (half-filled shell, analogous to Gd³⁺), seen in TbO₂ and Tb₄O₇.
Because Tb can stabilise both +3 and +4, XPS is used routinely to check oxidation state in mixed oxides.
Strong 3d–4f exchange leads to rich multiplet splitting in both 3d₅/₂ and 3d₃/₂.
Charge-transfer satellites are significant, particularly in Tb oxides; they appear several eV above the main peaks.
Lifetime broadening differs between 3d₅/₂ and 3d₃/₂ due to multiplet term-dependent widths.
Experimental Advice #
Prolonged X-ray exposure can induce gradual reduction of Tb⁴⁺ to Tb³⁺, especially in thin films and nanoparticles. Minimise dwell times and monitor sequential scans for spectral changes.
Tb metal oxidises quickly in air, forming Tb₂O₃ and Tb(OH)₃ at the surface.
For Tb⁴⁺ compounds (e.g. TbO₂), surface reduction to Tb³⁺ is common under ambient exposure. Samples should be prepared/transferred under inert atmosphere or measured quickly after preparation.
Data Analysis Guidance #
In Tb³⁺ spectra, the multiplet envelope is broad and asymmetric, making simple peak models insufficient.
In Tb⁴⁺ spectra (TbO₂), the pattern looks more like Gd³⁺ (because of the 4f⁷ half-filled shell). This provides a useful cross-check for assignments.
References #
- Islam, M. J., et al. (2020). “The effect of metal precursor on copper phase dispersion and nanoparticle formation for the catalytic transformations of furfural.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental: 119062. Read it online here.
- Miller, A. and G. Simmons (1993). “Copper by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 2(1): 55-60. Read it online here.
- Vasquez, R. (1998). “Cu2O by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 5(4): 257-261. Read it online here.
- Vasquez, R. (1998). “CuO by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 5(4): 262-266. Read it online here.
- Biesinger, M. C. (2017). “Advanced analysis of copper X‐ray photoelectron spectra.” Surface and interface analysis 49(13): 1325-1334. Read it online here.
- Thøgersen, A., et al. (2008). “An experimental study of charge distribution in crystalline and amorphous Si nanoclusters in thin silica films.” Journal of Applied Physics 103(2): 024308. Read it online here.
- Moretti, G. (1998). “Auger parameter and Wagner plot in the characterization of chemical states by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a review.” Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 95(2-3): 95-144. Read it online here.
- Batista, J., et al. (2001). “On the structural characteristics of γ-alumina-supported Pd–Cu bimetallic catalysts.” Applied Catalysis A: General 217(1-2): 55-68. Read it online here.
- Ghijsen, Jacques, et al. “Electronic structure of Cu 2 O and CuO.” Physical Review B 38.16 (1988): 11322. Read it online here.