Shake-up Peaks

View Categories

Shake-up Peaks

4 min read

In XPS, shake-up peaks are extra features that appear at slightly higher binding energy (BE) than the main core-level photoelectron peak. They are not new elements or contaminants — instead, they are satellite peaks caused by electronic excitations during the photoemission process.

When an X-ray photon ejects a core electron, the remaining atom is left in an excited, ionized state. Normally, the ejected electron carries away the difference between photon energy and the binding energy.

However, sometimes:

  • As the electron is emitted, another valence electron is simultaneously excited to a higher unoccupied orbital (like a π* or d* state).

  • This costs extra energy, so the photoelectron comes out with slightly less kinetic energy → meaning it appears at a higher binding energy in the spectrum.

This extra energy loss produces the shake-up peak, offset by a few electron volts from the main line.

Shake up process

Shake-up peaks are strongly associated with systems containing delocalized or partially filled electronic states:

  • Transition metal oxides → e.g. Cu²⁺ in CuO shows strong shake-up satellites in Cu 2p.

  • Aromatic/π-conjugated molecules → e.g. benzene, polymers, graphite (π→π* excitations).

  • Certain open-shell ions → where unpaired electrons can be promoted to higher energy states.

Position: They always occur at a fixed energy separation from the main peak (specific to material/electronic structure).

Shape: Typically weaker and broader than the main peak.

Not contamination: Unlike adventitious carbon or oxygen peaks, shake-ups track with the main peak intensity.

Element-specific: For example, Cu²⁺ shows strong satellites in Cu 2p, while Cu⁰ and Cu⁺ do not — making shake-ups useful for oxidation state identification.

Shake-off peaks are a special type of shake-up, where the excited electron is removed from the atom.

  • Prominent in atoms with delocalized or weakly bound electrons, since those valence electrons are easier to ionize during core-hole creation.

  • More noticeable in light elements (like C, N, O) compared to transition metals.

  • Often contributes to the “background” in XPS spectra, and is accounted for in background subtraction methods (e.g. Shirley or Tougaard backgrounds).

They look slightly dissimilar to shake-ups:

  • Shake-up = discrete, material-specific satellite peaks → great for identifying oxidation states and conjugated systems.

  • Shake-off = continuous, broad background → not diagnostic by itself, but explains the asymmetric tails in many XPS peaks.

Diagram of shake-up vs shake-off process