Ruthenium

View Categories

Ruthenium

5 min read

Orbitals and Energies #

Note – these are listed in BINDING ENERGY

 

Ru 3d ≈ 284 eV

Ru 3s ≈ 585 eV

Ru 3p ≈ 461 eV

Ru 4s ≈ 75 eV

Ru 4p ≈ 43 eV

Ruthenium Oxide Survey With Peak Markers for Ru

Doublet Separations #

Ru 3d = 4.2 eV

Ru 3p = 22.4 eV

Ru 4p = 3 eV

XPS of Ru 3d with doublet separation

Common Overlaps for Ru 3d #

C 1s – Ce 4s – Os 4d – Sr 3p – Tb 4p – Eu 4p – Kr 3s – K 2p – Dy 4p – Th 5s

Ru 3d Region With Overlapping Peak Markers

Auger Energies #

Note – these are listed in KINETIC ENERGY

 

Ru MNN ≈ 270 eV

XPS of Ru MNN Region

Common Binding Energies – Ru 3d #

Species #

B.E. / eV #

Charge Ref #

Reference #

Ru Metal

279.8

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

RuO2

280.6

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

RuCl3

281

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

Theory and Background #

Ruthenium (Ru) is a metal typically found in catalysis, electrochemistry and electrical applications.

XPS analysis of ruthenium is complicated due to the main Ru(3d) core-level overlapping with the C(1s) region, so spectra can be dominated by adventitious carbon signals, or that of an activated carbon support.

As with many metals, Ru exhibits asymmetry to its metallic core-lines, with RuO2 also exhibiting asymmetric Ru(3d) and also O(1s) core levels due to the conducting nature of the material (as shown below).

Ru 3d 5/2 and 3/2 peaks have differing FWHM due to Coster-Kronig effects.

RuO2 is found typically in one of two forms; anhydrous and the more common hydrated form which clearly shows the asymmetric nature of the peaks and screened states giving rise to satellite species often confused with higher oxidation states and can be seen below, together with the adventitious carbon overlap.

 
Ruthenium Coster-Kronig
Ruthenium Coster-Kronig

Experimental Advice #

RuCl3 will reduce under X-ray illumination, take care when analysing. See our page on sample damage in XPS for more information on how to overcome this.

Record both the Ru 3d and Ru 3p peaks when analysing Ru to help overcome C 1s overlap. For low loadings (e.g. Ru catalysts) of Ru, this might require long scan times. Suggest pass energy of 40 eV minimum for these samples.

RuCl3 exposed to Xray illumination

Data Analysis Guidance #

Peak BE / eV % Doublet Separation / eV FWHM / eV CasaXPS Lineshape
Ru 3d5/2 279.8 60 4.17 0.48 LF (0.8,1.25,500,180)
Ru 3d3/2 284.0 40   0.92 LF (1.01,1.25,500,50)
Ru 3p3/2 461.2 96.7 22.2 2.58 LF (1,1.2,25,5)
Ru 3p3/2 satellite 470.9 3.3   3.75 GL(30)

 

Ruthenium Metal Fits (pass energy = 20 eV) (1)

 

 

For more fits – see the work of Dr. David Morgan in Surface and Interface Analysis

Ruthenium fitting in XPS
Ruthenium fitting in XPS

Reference Datasets #

 

Coming soon