Mercury

View Categories

Mercury

5 min read

Orbitals and Energies #

Note – these are listed in BINDING ENERGY

 

Hg 4f ≈ 100 eV

Hg 4s ≈ 800 eV

Hg 4p ≈ 570 eV

Hg 4d ≈ 360 eV

Hg 5s ≈  120 eV

Hg 5p ≈ 59 eV

Hg 5d ≈  8 eV

 

Doublet Separations #

Hg 4f = 4.1 eV

Hg 4d = 19.2 eV

Hg 4p = 104 eV

Hd 5d = 1.9 eV

Common Overlaps for Hg 4f #

Si 2p – Sb 4p – La 4p – Al KLL (Al ka X-rays)Br LMM (Al ka X-rays) – Ga 3p – Pt 5s – Co 3s – Po 5p

Auger Energies #

Note – these are listed in KINETIC ENERGY

 

Hg MNN ≈ 2160 eV

Common Binding Energies – Cu 2p #

Species #

B.E. / eV #

Charge Ref #

Reference #

Hg Metal

99.9

Au 4f (83.98 eV)

Theory and Background #

Core level energies #

  • Hg 4f₇/₂ ≈ 99.8–100.5 eV (metallic Hg near 99.9 eV).

  • Hg 4f₅/₂ ≈ +4.2 eV higher (~104–105 eV).

  • Spin–orbit splitting ≈ 4.2 eV, larger than many transition metals.

  • Oxidation shifts:

    • Hg(II) compounds (oxides, halides) appear ~1–2 eV higher BE than Hg⁰.

    • Shifts can be subtle and vary with ligand environment.

Final-state effects #

  • Metallic Hg has weak conduction-electron screening → 4f peaks are relatively symmetric, without strong Doniach–Šunjić tails.

  • Compounds show broader, more symmetric peaks, sometimes with poorly resolved multiplet/satellite structure.

Satellites & shake features #

  • Hg(II) compounds (oxides, halides, organomercury) can exhibit weak shake-up satellites a few eV above the main 4f peaks.

  • Intensity is small; careful background subtraction needed to see them.

  • Satellites can serve as confirmation of oxidized Hg, though they are not as distinct as in some transition metals.

Experimental Advice #

  • Minimize air exposure: Hg can oxidize in air or adsorb contaminants that alter XPS.

  • Avoid heating: Do not heat Hg samples in vacuum; volatilization will contaminate pumps/analyzer.

  • Thin films & supported catalysts: Safer than bulk Hg — immobilized Hg compounds are preferred for analysis.

  • Storage: Keep in sealed containers; prepare samples fresh when possible

Data Analysis Guidance #

  • Line shapes:

    • Metallic Hg: symmetric GL (minimal asymmetry).

    • Oxides/halides: symmetric GL; broaden slightly.

  • Constraints:

    • Fix spin–orbit splitting at ~4.2 eV.

    • Fix area ratio at 4f₇/₂ : 4f₅/₂ = 4 : 3.

  • Background: Shirley or Tougaard; Tougaard may better handle loss features if visible.

  • Shake-ups: Add only if clearly resolved; typically weak (<10% intensity).

  • Chemical state separation: Use binding energy + presence of satellites + supporting regions (e.g. O 1s, Cl 2p) to confirm assignments.

Reference Datasets #

 

Coming soon

References #