Manganese

View Categories

Manganese

8 min read

Orbitals and Energies #

Note – these are listed in BINDING ENERGY

 

Mn 2p ≈ 641 eV

Mn 2s ≈ 769 eV

Mn 3s ≈ 84 eV

Mn 3p ≈ 49 eV

Mn 3d ≈ 4 eV

MnO2 Survey
Survey scan of MnO2 by XPS, showing relevant peak positions for Mn emissions

Doublet Separations #

Mn 2p (metal) = 11.2 eV

Mn 2p (oxides) = 11.7 eV

Mn 3s = variable (see below)

XPS of Mn 2p with doublet separation

Common Overlaps for Mn 2p #

Au 4p – Ra 4d – Ac 4d – Pb 4p – Cd 3p – Os 4p – In 3p – Ni LMM (Al Ka X-rays)

Common Overlaps for Mn 3s #

Lots, notable overlaps – Al 2pCu 3p Mg 2p

Mn 2p XPS for MnO2
Mn 2p XPS for MnO2 - showing potential peak overlaps from other elements
XPS of Mn 3s with Overlapping Peak Markers

Auger Energies #

Note – these are listed in KINETIC ENERGY

 

Cu LMM ≈ 580 eV

XPS of Mn LMM Region

Common Binding Energies – Mn 2p #

Species #

B.E. / eV #

Charge Ref #

Reference #

Mn Metal

638.6

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

Mn (II)

639.3

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

Mn (III)

640.8

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

Mn (IV)

642

Au 4f (83.96 eV)

Theory and Background #

Manganese speciation using the 2p region can be quite difficult due to complex multiplet splitting, and subtle differences in the binding energy of the various emissions.

 

Manganese Oxides Mn 2p Regions

Experimental Advice #

Often recording the Mn 2p region alone may not be the most practical approach, given the complexities of multiplet splitting in Manganese.

Recording both the Mn 2p, and the Mn 3p provides opportunity for two models in order to confirm the speciation (using the models of Ilton)[2], and if possible, the Mn 3s also. It may not always be possible, given the lower cross-sections of the 3p and 3s orbitals compared to the 2p, and if the sample is low in Mn content these regions may not provide enough signal intensity for accurate modelling.

Manganese Oxides Mn 3s Regions

Data Analysis Guidance #

It is common practice to record the Mn 3s peak in order to speciate based on the splitting energy – however Ilton et al report that this is not always reliable when considering mixed oxide systems.[2]

Modelling the Mn 2p is a possibility, and through the systems implemented by Ilton and Biesinger,[1] peak models may be developed that can describe the distinct states within select Mn compounds. Modelling the 3p region using the parameters provided int he work of Ilton, or using standard datasets, provides a second check for the sample which may be advantageous given the complex peak fits involved.

Care should be taken in the interpretation of these datasets, given the vast difference in kinetic energies of the Mn 2p and 3p photoelectrons – and if the samples is inhomogeneous in the z-dimension then this process will not be comparable.

MnO2 modelling

Reference Datasets #

 

Coming soon

References #

  1. Biesinger, Mark C., et al. “Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni.” Applied Surface Science 257.7 (2011): 2717-2730. Read it online here.
  2. Ilton, Eugene S., et al. “XPS determination of Mn oxidation states in Mn (hydr) oxides.” Applied Surface Science 366 (2016): 475-485. Read it online here.