Chromium

View Categories

Chromium

5 min read

Orbitals and Energies #

Note – these are listed in BINDING ENERGY

 

Cr 2p ≈ 575 eV

Cr 2s ≈ 695 eV

Cr 3s ≈ 74 eV

Cr 3p ≈ 43 eV

Cr 3d ≈ 2 eV

Cr2O3 Survey Scan with Peak Markers for Cr Emissions

Doublet Separations #

Cr 2p = 9.3 eV

XPS of Cr 2p with doublet separation

Common Overlaps for Cr 2p #

Ag 3p Te 3d – Ru 3s – Fr 4d – Hg 4p – W 4s – Cu LMM (Al Ka X-rays)

Cr2O3 Peaks and Overlapping Peak Markers

Auger Energies #

Note – these are listed in KINETIC ENERGY

 

Cr LMM ≈ 570 eV

Chromium LMM Auger - Note potential overlap with O KLL

Common Binding Energies – Cr 2p #

Species #

B.E. / eV #

Charge Ref #

Reference #

Cu Metal

574.4

Au 4f (84 eV)

Cr2O3

576.7

Au 4f (84 eV)

Theory and Background #

Chromium in particular oxidation states (most notably Cr(III) compounds, due to unpaired electrons) exhibits multiplet splitting. The 2p region exhibits broadening and asymmetry in a number of oxides, while the 3s region splits into two peaks in a manner indistinguishable when above or below the Curie temperature,[2] indicating that the ferromagnetic spin ordering does not influence this splitting. Cr(VI) is diamagnetic and therefore does not exhibit multiplet splitting. CrO2 is sometimes considered as a single pair of asymmetric peaks, due to being a conductive oxide[3] – however given the breadth of the peaks, and the paramagnetic [Ar]3d2 configuration of Cr(IV) it is considered possible to be due to multiplet splitting rather than a asymmetric shake-up processes.[4]

XPS of Cr 2p with doublet separation

Experimental Advice #

Chromium (VI) is known to photoreduce to tetra- and trivalent species under X-ray illumination.[5] This photoreduction can be greatly accelerated by certain charge neutralisation techniques – such as a dual neutraliser, and as such, care should be taken in selecting a neutralisation mode to minimise rapid sample damage.[6]

Data Analysis Guidance #

Fitting of Cr(III), much like any species with significant multiplet structure, can be a time-consuming task. Models developed from first-principles and standards can go a long way to help,[7] and recording your own data standards can help too.

 

Reference Datasets #

 

Coming soon

References #

  1. Salvi, Anna M., et al. “Peak fitting of the chromium 2p XPS spectrum.” Applied surface science 90.3 (1995): 333-341. Read it online here.
  2. Ikemoto, Isao, et al. “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of CrO2 and some related chromium compounds.” Journal of Solid State Chemistry 17.4 (1976): 425-430. Read it online here.
  3. Bullen, Heather A., and Simon J. Garrett. “CrO2 by XPS: comparison of CrO2 powder to CrO2 films on TiO2 (110) single crystal surfaces.” Surface Science Spectra 8.3 (2001): 225-233. Read it online here.
  4. Biesinger, Mark C., et al. “Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni.” Applied Surface Science 257.7 (2011): 2717-2730. Read it online here.
  5. Halada, Gary P., and Clive R. Clayton. “Photoreduction of hexavalent chromium during X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of electrochemical and thermal films.” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 138.10 (1991): 2921. Read it online here.
  6. Edwards, Lee, Paul Mack, and David J. Morgan. “Recent advances in dual mode charge compensation for XPS analysis.” Surface and Interface Analysis 51.9 (2019): 925-933. Read it online here.
  7. Biesinger, M. C., et al. “X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of chromium compounds.” Surface and interface analysis: an international journal devoted to the development and application of techniques for the analysis of surfaces, interfaces and thin films 36.12 (2004): 1550-1563. Read it online here.
  8.