Adding Doublet Peaks in Avantage

View Categories

Adding Doublet Peaks in Avantage

3 min read

Quick Overview #

When analysing peaks exhibiting spin-orbit coupling, we must introduce doublet peaks to properly model the arising twin emissions.

It is important we control the peak parameters relative to each other, in order to ensure our data models obey the laws of physics!

Position constraints in doublets in Avantage

Adding Doublet Peaks #

When you open the peak fitting window, if the selected spectrum is an emission with a spin-orbit pair (or the box next to ‘Add Doublet’ is input with a spin-orbit coupled doublet label, e.g. Ag3d), you have the option to add a pair of peaks.

Peak Fitting Button Avantage
Peak Fitting Button Avantage

Avantage by default includes peak fitting constraints relevant to spin-orbit peak properties, meaning you don’t need to remember the parameters for the different orbitals! Simply click add doublet, and check the peak properties in the fitting table.

Adding Doublets in Avantage
Adding Doublets in Avantage

FWHM Constraints #

FWHM constraints default to 1:1, since for the vast majority of spin-orbit doublets the core-hole lifetime should be identical, and therefore the peak widths are the same. In certain examples however, this is not the case, and we must change this constraint. For example, in TiO2 we can adjust our default constraint to A * 1 (+- 1.1) and hit enter, to allow the FWHM constraint to vary between a range of energies.

FWHM Constraints in Doublets in Avantage
FWHM Constraints in Doublets in Avantage

Area Constraints #

By default, Avantage constraints the peak size based on height. You can change this by deleting the constraint in the peak height box, and inputting a new constraint into the area column. This may be more useful for systems with uneven heights, such as those found in Coster-Kronig broadening doublets.

Area constraints in doublets in Avantage
Area constraints in doublets in Avantage

Position Constraints #

In the Peak BE column, the constraint row can be modified to specify the splitting energy between peaks based on literature data. This can also be modified in the form of X + ### (+ Y, – Z) – e.g. A + 5.7 (+0.3, -0.2) will put the second peak between 5.5 and 6 eV higher than peak A.

X = Peak label to reference to

### = Energy splitting

Y = Upper limit

Z = Lower limit

Position constraints in doublets in Avantage
Position constraints in doublets in Avantage

References #

  1. Islam, M. J., et al. (2020). “The effect of metal precursor on copper phase dispersion and nanoparticle formation for the catalytic transformations of furfural.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental: 119062. Read it online here.
  2. Miller, A. and G. Simmons (1993). “Copper by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 2(1): 55-60. Read it online here.
  3. Vasquez, R. (1998). “Cu2O by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 5(4): 257-261. Read it online here.
  4. Vasquez, R. (1998). “CuO by XPS.” Surface Science Spectra 5(4): 262-266. Read it online here.
  5. Biesinger, M. C. (2017). “Advanced analysis of copper X‐ray photoelectron spectra.” Surface and interface analysis 49(13): 1325-1334. Read it online here.
  6. Thøgersen, A., et al. (2008). “An experimental study of charge distribution in crystalline and amorphous Si nanoclusters in thin silica films.” Journal of Applied Physics 103(2): 024308. Read it online here.
  7. Moretti, G. (1998). “Auger parameter and Wagner plot in the characterization of chemical states by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a review.” Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 95(2-3): 95-144. Read it online here.
  8. Batista, J., et al. (2001). “On the structural characteristics of γ-alumina-supported Pd–Cu bimetallic catalysts.” Applied Catalysis A: General 217(1-2): 55-68. Read it online here.
  9. Ghijsen, Jacques, et al. “Electronic structure of Cu 2 O and CuO.” Physical Review B 38.16 (1988): 11322. Read it online here.